DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[T0 Th3 M4X]

It's not "my" problem.  It's "your" problem if you make claims you can't properly support.

I don't care about generic explanations, large pots of information that I would need to randomly sort through because you cited them.  I care about what you say and being able to show it.  Beyond that, it's just someone making invalid statements.   Now if you can pinpoint something someone found out with a direct citation, then that's something.  But to tell someone to go through thousands of journals because you claim something is there is just telling me you don't know and want to send me on a wild goose chase you know I won't go on.

LOL. I don't remember making any claim.
I'm just trying to educate you on the subject of evolution. You're the one excusing yourself in order to maintain your ignorance.
Good luck with that.

I don't need you to educate me, nor did I ask.  If someone makes a claim, they should support it.  If you want to help them, that's your choice.  If you don't care to, and they don't, then I don't care either.  Not going on a hunt for information people claim exists if they don't even know where it exists.

---

At this point, I don't even know.  At least three different claims about science, especially during the past 150 years, that supposedly support the views of said individuals and refute the claims of CDF47's.  Of course it also changed to "relevant" science when I questioned that, then I wanted to know what was considered "relevant" and who got to choose and why.  Now I guess I'm supposed to purchase a journal subscription and sort through thousands of journals to find the info on my own.  That's pretty much where it's at now.  From my perspective of course.  Thus my claim of a "wild goose chase." 

I'm really not trying to take sides here.  I don't hold to special I.D. ideology, even though I believe in creation, because I think what is known can get diluted when people add on their own ideas of what may or may not have happened.  In other words, I don't own a time machine and I dunno because I wasn't there.

BTW, nice to see ya again.

Likewise!  So, are you objecting to evolution?  Is that the gist of the conversation?

Not objecting to anything.  I don't generalize about evolution because it's a broad topic.   Some things may very well be true and other things are conjecture that may or may not be true.  More or less, interested in looking at individual claims under a microscope and sort out the good from the bad.