RE: what about chief fakem-news and the crazy christian/maga protesters
January 24, 2019 at 11:00 am
(This post was last modified: January 24, 2019 at 11:45 am by Drich.)
(January 23, 2019 at 5:54 pm)Shell B Wrote:(January 23, 2019 at 5:30 pm)Drich Wrote: you guys don't have any idea what racism is. to you it is a word to be used that allows you to hate others. or you misidentify any unfriendly word as raceism.
Racism is 1/2 your family not wanting anything to do with you because you are the wrong blood. racism is a friend finding out you are not white or Mexican and after being friend for years. they just 'unlike you' racism is fight the white kids in the neighborhood everyday of your life from when school started till probably mid high school/when you got big enough to break bone. (because you eat all of their missing dogs and cats) Racism is not calling a man of different color out for being in a liar. racism is not mocking a man for failing to honor himself or his culture. I never put my culture above not belittle his culture only spoke negatively about an individual, which again speaking negatively about an individual behavior is not racism.
Some of those are racism, as is mocking Native American language. That's what was racist, and you definitely belittled his culture.
It's funny that you thought the unfriendliness is what I considered racist.
which native american language as maybe you didn't know native americans speak a plethora of dialects, and traditionally none of them are english. So how is it in english can I mock what can not be identified as english?
Or do you mean to say I am making light of the native american stereotype english accent? If that is it how is it racism if my comments are directed at an individual? i am calling a specfic people a chief of fake news, does a miss placed "m" make someone a raceist especially when speaking about a specifically disgusting person who is trying to use race to destroy a young man's future? a man who has in the past falsely accused others and has been caught in a stolen glory situation (claiming himself to be a vietnam vet when he was not ever deployed let alone saw combat) You would rather defend a slanderous liar who is using race and patriotism as a 'vietnam vat' to gardner support to destroy an innocent boy's life, than allow somone like me to expose him by tearing down and mocking his foundational social platform.. because again the supplimentary video showed him crying like the 1970's don't liter campaign indian pleading for white parents to stop preaching hate when clearly none existed.
If this guy can use race and hate to try and divide us then should not it also be his undoing? if this guy is misusing sentiment towards american indians to attack the whole white race, then shouldn't we take away everything of honor he is misusing?
Or maybe you should define racism as you do not seem to understand what racism is. it seems you have confused antagonism on an individual level, or you are trying to say you are in authority to police my very thoughts! meaning you are assigning intent of racial superiority where I clearly I have demonstrated none exists.
(January 23, 2019 at 8:06 pm)onlinebiker Wrote: Far as I'm concerned it' s just a buncha idiots looking to get some camera time.
I' m not even gonna look.
again it's not about the actual events as so much as how the main stream media had play out the fake news about trump on friday (claiming trump order business dealings in russia covered up before the election) which was quickly denied by the russia investigators of all people, and here in the maga/indian video where the new while having all the information decides to frame this poor kid as being something he wasn't. while also claiming his peers were mocking this guy when even the original antagonists claimed the 'stupid white kids think's pops is there to support them.' while they all danced on and in tune with the drummer the narrative from the antagonist changed again now claiming 'pops' tamed the crowd. meaning the drummer subdued the ill intent of the maga kids who just before 'pops' arrived were sitting quietly for their bus.
Again the news had both side and still yet decided to create a story destroying a boy, just so people like you would hate people like me more.
That is the point of this thread that is the story, and now here is the question NONE of you has the balls to answer yet..
In the light of these two 100% fake news stories at what point do you guys start to question the motivations of the mainstream media? if they have been called out in two huge lies in just two days, how many more lies do you guys accept daily?
(January 23, 2019 at 9:13 pm)Jane2d Wrote: Full video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3EC1_gcr34
11 mins various angles:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8kxeFb84iw
Some outlets are calling him "Chief Running Fridge" after linking him to Fridge repair in Neb rather than being a "recon ranger" as described in other news 'sources'.
https://www.redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2019...te-claims/
The full video reveals Phillips went after the wrong group of people, walking past the real bigots on scene, I would assume because of Phillips own bias. Those kids were waiting at the assigned area for their group doing their own school chants to distract from the abuse being hurled upon them by the Fake Isrealis. They had no obligation to part ways for Phillips, as is clear in the video, there was plenty of open step to climb to the memorial if that was Phillips intent on travel. Nope, clearly he had to go out of his way to confront the kids for doing school chants.
There was no belittling of Phillips culture. There was a tremendous amount of respect and restraint on the part of those kids who had taken a LOT of abuse and then to have this drum hammered in your face (and they are LOUD) with Indian singing grating in your ears (sorry I love the drums but the singing is a whole nother ball game).
If you knew anything about drums and singing, the kids joining in is considered appropriate. This was not a part of the official march, this was not an opening/closing ceremony, the etiquette considered respectful/polite was met by the kids. Not by Phillips who was the intruder on the scene.
Honestly I don't think anyone is concerned with the truth anymore... they are all trained to look for opportunities to identify socially 'immoral behavior' so they can openly be as bigoted as they claim others to be, in short most people on this side just look for reason to hate, and if they get it wrong they want to sweep it under the rug and look for another opportunity so as to feel justified in what they do. This was such a KKK way of doing things it's not even funny, yet here we are again.
the bad guy in this story? the one who posted it on the web site and reminded the people here that a problem with a person is not a problem with a whole race of people. I made fun of a cigar store cartoon by assigning a man attacking a whole race/class of people a cartoon name, and I'm the racist for speaking out against an indivisual while a man who condemns a race of people for not having their children act as well as the children of his race...
(January 23, 2019 at 9:01 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:define racism sport, because clearly we are talking about two different things.(January 23, 2019 at 5:54 pm)Shell B Wrote: Some of those are racism, as is mocking Native American language. That's what was racist, and you definitely belittled his culture.
It's funny that you thought the unfriendliness is what I considered racist.
And here's what the old man has to say about being called Chief Fakum News:
And for the record, since Drich brought up the Prejudice Plus Power Paradigm, well, Rationalwiki has a page on the subject that points out the many problems with it, and here's a simple explanation of what I think about it from David Pilgrim, curator of the Jim Crow Museum of Racist Memorabilia that sums it up:
Quote:Can blacks be racist? The answer, of course, will depend on how you define racism. If you define it as "prejudice against or hatred toward another race," then the answer is yes. If you define racism as "the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race," the answer is yes. And if you define racism as "prejudice and discrimination rooted in race-based loathing," then the answer is, again, yes. However, if you define racism as "a system of group privilege by those who have a disproportionate share of society’s power, prestige, property, and privilege," then the answer is no. In the end, it is my opinion that individual blacks can be and sometimes are racists. However, collectively, blacks are neither the primary creators nor beneficiaries of the racism that permeates society today.
See the whole explanation he gives, including his own experience being bullied by poor white people (and they were so poor that to consider them as having any power, like the equation requires is downright laughable), and how it temporarily warped his view of race.
You may have had to put up with a lot of shit from being half-white, half-Korean, but clearly if you feel the need to give Nathan Philips a bullshit name like Chief Fakum News, well, it looks like your understanding of racism only goes so far.
then show me how what I said applies.
my examples show:rac·ism
/ˈrāˌsizəm/
noun
- prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.
now in each case of real racism there is a group of people who hate, or even exclude members of society members of one's family because of their blood line. my mother is as nice as she can be to me and my sisters but we are always at arms length because we do not belong in her old school korean group of friends and family.. This cultural divide exists among american born and korean born people as well. but more so/bastard status if mix race. Again each example shows a system of hate by a group or an individual because their group or blood line demands segregation and separate treatment because of genetic difference.
Now again person to person antagonism is not automatically racism discrimination on it's own is not racism negative behavior between two people does not become racism until the reason for said behavior is because one believes his race is better than the other.
Me making fun of someone playing the race card is calling that person out for being fake, what he was doing as a minority (blaming all white parents for intolerant white children who do not behave with the respect children of his people's decent) is race ism.
but you people don't care. you/all again look for reasons to hate and labling someone you like a racist that's all you need to be happy in life. you don't care about honor integrity or justice, as look at the responses this thread has gotten I'm even been placed on some 30 day probation because someone labeled me a racist and that's all it took. add the letter m to the work fake and now it is ok to say and do whatever because this person surrendered all of his rights. by mocking an individual not a race for playing the race card himself.