DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

Strawman again.

How many times are you guys going to use strawman arguments?  That is such obvious BS debate tactics a lot of people can see through.  It's weak.

 I'm sorry.

How is pointing out that you are accepting only one, single man's view and not the view of every one else who works in the field of biology a 'Straw man'?

You are referencing one man, P.Z. Myers, yes?

Who effectivly stands alone and apart from the rest of the scientific comunity.

I fail to see where there is a traw man in my statement?

Where did I say I follow just one man.  I just think he is the best standing with few beside him like many great scientists before him that didn't crack to the pressures of the establishment.

---

 I'm sorry.

How is pointing out that you are accepting only one, single man's view and not the view of every one else who works in the field of biology a 'Straw man'?

You are referencing one man, P.Z. Myers, yes?

Who effectivly stands alone and apart from the rest of the scientific comunity.

I fail to see where there is a traw man in my statement?

He is referencing Steven Meyer the ID crackpot, not P. Z. Myers the evolutionary biologist.

Yes, that is right.

---

Actually both are true.

-demonstrating the underlying cause for these last 1k pages worth of failure in a single sentence.  You're the kind of person who believes that mutually exclusive and contradictory things can be simultaneously true.  Knowing that, it's wholly unsurprising that you believe in ID, and that it's proponents are credible, despite the mountain of evidence and information..which you requested and received..to the contrary.

What were the contradictions here?  Not sure what you are talking about now.