(January 24, 2019 at 2:57 pm)Acrobat Wrote:(January 24, 2019 at 2:53 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: ....?
You have my answers, if you have an issue with those answers then lay it out, there's no sense in me quoting myself again.
K I get it, you don’t want to answer my pretty straightforward yes or no questions.
Why? I guess that will remain a mystery.
Nothing you have asked is "straightforward."
Been at debate since 01 on an almost daily basis, so if you think your argument's here are new, you'd be wrong. And I am sure lots of other atheists here would agree.
The pattern is the same.
"I'm not arguing my God claim, holy book or religion, I just want you to answer my questions".
Seen that from Muslims and Jews and Buddhists and Hindus too over the years.
You have goal. So just admit it, and stop pretending you don't.
I do have a goal. My goal is to get you to consider you only think you need a religion/god, but I'd argue you don't need a god or a religion.
Your goal is to try to convince us you picked the correct club/God.
Why have I noticed this pattern from every religion over the years? Because while they claim in one thread they are not trying to point you somewhere, the same person starts another thread, or goes to another website to argue they got it right.
Your problem is you are simply not used to your tactic exposed and simply expect us to go, "Gee isn't that a nifty claim".
If you are not afraid of your position, then don't back off of it, defend it. But I am no fool, this is not my first rodeo.
When the theist cant simply quote their holy book, they do what you are doing here, and pretend that is not what they are doing. Then when they cant get away with that, they attack science. Then when they cant get away with that, they claim science points to their club/deity/religoin/god.
I don't pretend in any thread, or back off my position that humans make up religions/god/s.
Now again, this is not about human rights at all, just telling you your logic is still based on old mythology.
