DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

No, it's not.  If it were, you could show it, but in 1k pages you haven't.  You've merely repeated the belief.  It's okay that it's your fact and logic free belief..it really is.  It's not okay to misrepresent it as something it isn't.

Jesus doesn't care much for a liar, or for those who preach a false gospel.

Yes, I have shown it (regarding DNA proving design).  I am no liar and i speak the truth.

---

That is a belief but it is based on logic and reason as well as faith.

Facts don’t come from wish thinking masquerading as logic or reason.   It absofuckinglutely never comes from faith.   Facts are deduced from evidence.  You have produced no salient evidence, no sound deduction, as has been explained to you in meticulous detail many times.

Only idiot arrogance made possible by your disgusting religion caused you to come back again and again with the same shit, and narrowed your patgetic mind so much that you are unable to do anything else.

LOL...Oh come on, I'm not that messed up.

---

I only really disagree with the multiverse and common ancestry in general related to this argument.

Yes, as I said; only the categories of science that disagree with your world view, lol.  You don see anything wrong with that...?

I believe those are flawed and there is no strong evidence for either.  I really believe that and see nothing wrong with it.  I was a skeptic for a point in my life before I found out that there was information in DNA.  Skeptic in that I wondered if to hold a deist view point or a Christian view point (I always excepted Christ though so never really a deist).  Design was always pretty evident to me except for a short time as a child.  I had an atheistic friend who briefly convinced me there was no God when I was 8 years old.  I will never forget that.  My one week or so as an atheist at 8 years old...LOL.

---

Alot of people assume that some counterfactual thing is necessary for their worldview to be true.  Consider his earlier proclamation that if what he's said is not a fact, then there are no facts.

This mistaken assumption leads to extremely specific denials.  

For him, for example....common ancestry is "untrue"..but only because he thinks that this would make his religion false.  He likely doesn't think that paternity tests are "untrue" - and doesn't realize that the truth of a paternity test and the truth of common ancestry rest on the same facts and methodologies.  So he denies one specific aspect of a broader fact he actually accepts, even.

It's not a categorical rejection....it's a surgical one, lol.  That's what makes it so funny.  If he was just like "fuck biology, whadda they know" that would be one thing.  I bet he even knows why he's wrong, even though he certainly doesn't think it makes him wrong.

No, you got that wrong.  The facts I was referring to is that the information in DNA proves design.  The rest of what I said are my beliefs and claims and other facts.

---

It's not a categorical rejection....it's a surgical one, lol.  

Lol, that is a very good analogy.

No, it is not since the evidence in that case points elsewhere.  There is no common ancestry.

---

That is a belief but it is based on logic and reason as well as faith.

Buddy, if you had reason and evidence, you wouldn’t need faith, now would you?

Further, if faith is required, why have you spent 1,200 pages trying to convince us you’re right using ID theory? Wtf?!

Not just ID theory.  I am telling you the complex and functional information in DNA "proves" design.  This is what I mean when I say, stating the facts.  Not trying to be rude or piss you off with this post.  Just trying to explain where I am coming from.  I know it is a bit repetitive sometimes.

---

And it goes on and on

That's because there is more to discuss.