(January 26, 2019 at 11:04 am)CDF47 Wrote: [quote='downbeatplumb' pid='1880304' dateline='1548492080']
Show us how it points to a designer. Simple things can lead to complexity, even functional complexity over time.
Show us the evidence for how a designer could have done it.
At the moment all you have is a argument from ignorance which has been pointed out since page one.
(January 26, 2019 at 11:04 am)CDF47 Wrote: No, simple things do not lead to functional systems like this without a Designer's hand being involved.
That is simply incorrect. There are perfectly good mechanisms that can lead to functional systems without a designer.
I know you have seen what I'm talking about because many many times you have been shown it over the course of this thread.
And again you have not shown how a designer is a better answer, you have not shown how it did the designing, what it used to implement its design. You just say it did and that is good enough for you.
So given that there are well researched and evidenced alternatives to your idea of some sort of designer and that your idea of a designer has no evidence to support, it are you ready to concede that your initial premise is fatally flawed?
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
