DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

@ Mr Inquisition:

Your every other word in this thread is a lie, why should I believe you re oec's. Especially as I know quite a few. The oec viewpoint is theistic evolution, ie god meant for humans to descend (or in the oec mind, ascend) from apes*.

* And not monkeys as you so mendaciously assert. Lying constantly about evolution might work amongst your fellow yecs at the "discovery" "institute" but not here where we pay attention to reality.

Yeah yeah from apes I know. Dr. Steven Meyer believes in oec and not in a common descent from apes.

---

Prove it.  You can't.  You speak pseudo science.

Too bad for you, it's you that's full of crap. 
You are the very definition of pseudo-science. You and your snake-oil salesmen.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...-ancestor/

You have no converts.
No one buys your garbage.
Every minute here, for you is wasted time.

Some will see the truth. Others will be blind to it.

---

Then don't compare me to him.

You are exactly like him.

Science shows OEC is right.

Lie. Science shows the exact opposite. You know this so it can only be an intentional lie.

Prove it.  You can't.  You speak pseudo science.

The DNA evidence is long established. Why are you cherry-picking? Especially when you clearly have not a clue what DNA shows. You claim that the DNA evidence shows an adam and eve origin when it clearly does not. You reject common ancestry when the DNA shows that we clearly do have a common ancestor.
That's 5 blatant lies.
1. DNA proves adam and eve
2. DNA does not prove common ancestry
3. Neanderthal genes do not exist
4. There was a first human
5. It can't be proven when it actually has

Count them. 5 lies in one go

Have you no shame at all?

Wrong.  Most OEC do not believe in a common ancestry with monkeys.

That is blatant horseshit. RCC is the single biggest christian denomination and they accept it while being OEC. Face it. You are not OEC at all.

Make that lie #6

I am OEC.