At work.
It's okay to say "I don't know how the design thing derandomizes the mutation event." CDF47.
You really have to 'Let go' of your "Fine tuning is answer for everything" CDF47.
(March 5, 2019 at 9:18 am)CDF47 Wrote:(March 5, 2019 at 9:15 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Uhm..... no CDF47.
Those are more random assertions.
Pointing you back on to my question.
You posted;
"The random mutation that occur are completely random. There are two options; Either design or complete randomness. Design is obviously the clear opt8on that is true."
Okay, lets grant you this 'True design' in regards to mutations.
How does/might it work/happen?
So called 'Fine tuning' just sets the table.
How does the designing 'Thing' derandomize the mutation events?
He has derandomized them as we have found them. My point was He created all this fine-tuning. Not sure the details of all the implementation of His design but some of it is obvious as we observe.
It's okay to say "I don't know how the design thing derandomizes the mutation event." CDF47.
You really have to 'Let go' of your "Fine tuning is answer for everything" CDF47.
