DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

After design is proven the extent of design is not totally known. 

Still waiting for design to be proven.

Like I said, there may be some randomness built into the design but one thing is sure.  The universe and living systems are designed.

You say alot of shit, should I go back to posting the things you say side by side and asking you which of the two assholes had it right?  

I am not rejecting anything but a multiverse which was the atheist scientist attempt at explaining the fine-tuned universe which had a beginning in a Big Bang and continues to expand.  That universe creating machine that makes the multiverse must be finely-tuned though if it were to exist.

.......................................?  

So, alot of people wonder what the point in engaging with you or maintaining this thread may be.  They wonder this because you present a picture of a seriously dense person.  Why continue knowing that the nut will continue to be a nut?  For what it's worth, if a person engages with you or in this thread in some doomed attempt to make you less of a nut then there's no point to that at all.

You, otoh, have a strong reason to begin engaging with your own thread.  OFC you'll still be a nut, but 1235 pages worth of consideration could have helped you to form a better argument, a cogent one that isn't self contradictory, at least.  You've squandered that opportunity.  If you think that this subject is important, and you've repeatedly claimed that you do, then perhaps you ought to put in the sort of work an important subject deserves?

Again, functional genetic code proves design.

I am simply not sure about the extent of randomness inside the universe.  I don't think anyone is.

I am not a nut.  That is all you can do is name call.  I did not contradict myself in this thread.  I simply do not know the extent of randomness.  Big deal.

---

@CDF47

There is literally no way for me to determine whether you are a troll, or just really simple-minded. Have you ever heard of Poe’s Law?  It does not follow that just because you don’t appear to be intentionally breaking any rules, that the quality of your contributions are worth responding to. But, it also doesn’t follow that just because you don’t appear to be intentionally breaking any rules, you aren’t, in fact, trolling us. In other words, given the lack of substance in your posts, your motives for being here are irrelevant. You’re a surface level nuisance, and I’m getting a little tired of folks feeding your presence here, while simultaneously complaining about it. If they starve you, you will go somewhere else for the attention you clearly crave. Of that, I am certain.

I am not a troll.  I am not trying to deliberately get a rise out of anyone.  I am not here to cause havoc and dismay.  I have an opposing opinion from people here is all.  An eternally important one in my opinion.  Isn't this the sort of discussions people should be having on a site like this though?  Listening to and discussing opposing views?

---

If this one goes away another one will make a new thread filled with the same stuff, that's just how it works here at AF.  The existence and maintenance of this thread starves other would-be beheites and trolls, they just can't compete with the raging dumpster fire.

We watched it happen with Ev, lol.  So..you know..working as intended.  

I am not a beheite.  There are molecular machines.  That is not disputed.

---

Begs the question of what you think a good point looks like.  Nevermind that, though.....of all the different "points" you've tried to raise..which of them, in retrospect, don't seem like good points anymore?  If you were to start all over or start on a different board, what would you keep and what would you cut?

I think I would keep everything exactly the same.  I spoke the truth in this thread and I stand by my points that I made.