DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

If you say so.  Are we done with the whole eve thing, then, or do you want to continue to maintain that insistence even as you deny the things that would be required for it to be true?  

Have you made up your mind yet...and whichever way you go with it, are you ready to acknowledge that the remainder of comments you've made on either side of that line were misinformed? I only ask because that;s what a discussion looks like, talking with people about something, rather than talking at them about nothing. It's also what it looks like when a person is whittling the detritus of their thoughts into something approaching a cogent position that they can then argue for in good faith.

Are you ready to have a discussion? Or would you prefer to endlessly profess the fact free articles of your faith to a bunch of people who don't give a shit?

I guess we settled on a position related to Mt-Eve so I'm ready to move on from that one.

---

Some believe Neanderthals fall into beasts of the field, Biblically speaking.  They have a pretty common body design with humans but they have differences.  I do not believe Neanderthals are counted as human beings.  Some believe the opposite, that they fall into the human category, which I disagree with.

The ancient Hebrews had no clue there even was a category of homo neaderthalensis.
It is nowhere even mentioned in any Bible text.
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/huma...rthalensis
The POINT is they were able to interbreed. You even know what that means ?
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/huma...ls/species

You forgot to say EXACTLY why they are not human.

They may fall in the human category then as many believe. Either that or they are considered beasts of the field Bibically speaking. Not every beast is named. That's not the point of the book.