RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
March 14, 2019 at 3:41 pm
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2019 at 3:42 pm by Bucky Ball.)
(March 14, 2019 at 12:59 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(March 14, 2019 at 10:50 am)Bucky Ball Wrote: The ancient Hebrews had no clue there even was a category of homo neaderthalensis.
It is nowhere even mentioned in any Bible text.
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/huma...rthalensis
The POINT is they were able to interbreed. You even know what that means ?
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/huma...ls/species
You forgot to say EXACTLY why they are not human.
They may fall in the human category then as many believe. Either that or they are considered beasts of the field Bibically speaking. Not every beast is named. That's not the point of the book.
Speaking of the naming of the beasts ...
Genesis 2:19
"Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals. But for Adam none of them proved to be a suitable mate."
Ahem.
"Proved to be a suitable mate".
1. Kind of a dumb god ya got there, doesn't know what to make him for a mate.
2. What were the "tryouts" like ?




Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist