RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
March 14, 2019 at 10:42 pm
(This post was last modified: March 14, 2019 at 10:48 pm by CDF47.)
(March 14, 2019 at 3:41 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote:(March 14, 2019 at 12:59 pm)CDF47 Wrote: They may fall in the human category then as many believe. Either that or they are considered beasts of the field Bibically speaking. Not every beast is named. That's not the point of the book.
Speaking of the naming of the beasts ...
Genesis 2:19
"Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the wild animals and all the birds in the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds in the sky and all the wild animals. But for Adam none of them proved to be a suitable mate."
Ahem.
"Proved to be a suitable mate".
1. Kind of a dumb god ya got there, doesn't know what to make him for a mate.
2. What were the "tryouts" like ?
![]()
![]()
![]()
There were no tryouts. He made him Eve.
(March 14, 2019 at 6:11 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote:(March 14, 2019 at 1:43 am)CDF47 Wrote: I've read plenty of science books in the past.
It is unknown whether the first MtEve and YAdam ever met.
You are claiming that they did. Prove it.
(March 14, 2019 at 1:43 am)CDF47 Wrote: I've read plenty of science books in the past.
It is unknown whether the first MtEve and YAdam ever met.
But it is known that mtEve had a mother and at least one sister. And similarly, at least one aunt. It's right there in the definition of what mtEve actually is.
This is rather easy to prove, unlike most aspects of the theory.
1. Find any matrilineal lineage that leads to mtEve's mother.
2. Find any matrilineal lineage that does not lead to mtEve's mother.
3. Two tasks accomplished.
A. mtEve's mother exists.
and
B. mtEve's mother is not mtEve.
You are still missing the key word "matrilineal" either because you know that it is fatal to your argument or you simply are that stupid.
OK CDF, let's try this from a different direction.
There actually is a way that your idiotic belief that everyone can be traced back to one particular man and one particular woman can work quite easily.
The solution is really straightforward. You acknowledge that something in the region of 128 billion humans have ever existed. That's a fuzzy figure at best, but roughly works. Personally, in such discussions, I go with 120, but close enough. We can never reach any accurate count so approximations must suffice.
To make your idea work, all of them, all 128 billion of them male and female, without exception must have had at least one son and at least one daughter who both reproduced. That is the only way your daft idea can work. Were it otherwise, either a male or female lineage would go extinct.
You are claiming that this is so, everyone without exception must have had a minimum of one son AND one daughter.
Do you think that is a reasonable claim to make?
I can't prove they met. Scripturally, they did.
There was incest in the beginning to populate the Earth. Some had many sons and daughters and others had few to none. This is the way it worked out.
(March 14, 2019 at 10:42 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Why move on to some other thing when you won't respond to the last? Should I expect different next time? You wanted a discussion about this very important subject, it's up to you whether or not you engage.
I did engage and I answered your question.
The LORD Exists: http://www.godandscience.org/
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8
Intelligent Design (Short Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVkdQhNdzHU
Intelligent Design (Longer Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzj8iXiVDT8