No reason justifies disbelief.

[bennyboy]

That's fine.  Let's specify-- I'm talking about human science, not the science of magical space monkeys in another dimension.

No such thing.  Science is a method, not a specific user.

Yeah, it's a method which depends on material observations taken within a particular framework.

Science does not, in fact, answer the questions I claim it's incapable of addressing.  If it does, then this thread can end with a link.  Go ahead and provide it.

It answers "why" questions routinely, and -is- the tool we use to answer questions of cosmogony.  

Really? It's the tool we use to answer questions of cosmogony? Great news. Go ahead and tell me why science says the cosmos exists. *holds breath*

Out of your gourd.

Not that it matters, since no amount of saying batshit things about science..or even pointing out things it doesn't answer... will ever establish the validity of the metaphysical or immaterial.  Not how that works.

That's nice. Potatoes vary in size. And please-- stop talking about my mother's socks!