DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

It is too obvious that complex and functional information is designed not to believe it.  It is clear as day.  Some atheists may be lying about this.  I still believe that may be true.

So your sole reason for claiming that DNA is proof of a creator is "It's just obvious".

Think about that for a moment. That's all you have as an argument. Does "It's just obvious" work in any other part of your life? What would happen if you walked into your bank and claimed your mortgage was null and void because "It's just obvious". What would the bank say?

Suppose you walked up on the forecourt of a car dealership and simply took a car for your self because you simply deserve it. Do you think "It's just obvious" would suffice as an excuse? What would the judge say at your trial to such a defense?

No, you are fully aware that "It's just obvious" is not a reason or an argument for anything because you would not use it IN ANY OTHER CONTEXT. You would be laughed out of town. Or lynched.

Knowing this, you still use it for your magic sky fairy without shame because you are fundamentally dishonest. Well tough. It is and remains just an example of the special pleading fallacy.

Consider, for a moment, what the consequence is of your bovine repetition.

Rainbows are caused by unicorn farts. "It's just obvious"

The universe was created by the Flying Spaghetti Monster (bless his noodly appendage) "It's just obvious"

Jesus was a homosexual wet dream that Paul have on the road to Damascus. "It's just obvious"

---

DNA is in a sense a blue print. It contains instructions to make our body parts. Also, it is way more than that. Emedded in the code is the tool kit that executes that plan. This is all rolled into one molecule. Additionally, it functions as an information processor. This is all rolled into one.

LOL. You haven't a clue how DNA works or what it does. It's just obvious.

I provided plenty of proof and evidence in this thread including in written text, links, videos,...................

---

I am not wasting anyone's time.  Just discussing the most important topic there is to discuss.

It's only important to brainwashed people like yourself.
Sadly, there are many equally brainwashed to think it's important.... so here we are, on an atheist forum, addressing the psychological fault that the topic takes advantage of.

This bit is obvious. Your mind is particularly receptive to the idea of the divine, because it was habituated to it since very early in your childhood. Regardless of how much "critical thought" you put in later in life, those early formative years decided your brain pathways.
That is why you say "it's obvious that DNA Proves Existence of a Designer" (paraphrasing here), while it's not obvious at all to anyone who's not brainwashed like you.

It's also obvious that your ignorance of basic human psychology facilitates your receptiveness to the unfounded notion of the divine.

I've studied human psychology on my own so I do not have an ignorance of that topic, sorry.  I am not brainwashed.  Some atheists on here appear to be brainwashed to me.

---

This was a biologist with specialty in the cell.

That's nice, and?  As has already been explained to you, at length, it's not actually necessary to reject any of your foundational assertions in order to reject your conclusion.

Like I said, go listen to more biologists, it will be more productive.

DNA is in a sense a blue print.

Fine, if you say so.  We're well aware of a process that can create these "blueprints".   When a mommy and a daddy love each other very much........

It contains instructions to make our body parts.

Fine, if you say so.  We're well aware of a process that provides this instruction.  Organic chemistry works.

Also, it is way more than that. Emedded in the code is the tool kit that executes that plan. This is all rolled into one molecule. Additionally, it functions as an information processor. This is all rolled into one.

Fine, if you say so.  We're well aware of a process that functions in this way.  Material interaction is the basis of computational architecture.

There is a creation so there is a Creator.  Come on now the evidence is crystal clear.  These are instructions to perform specific functions.  It is designed.

---

It is too obvious that complex and functional information is designed not to believe it.  It is clear as day.  Some atheists may be lying about this.  I still believe that may be true.

Yet you cannot even begin to support this nonsense by defining it. You cannot say what "complex" is or means, or what degree of complexity requires "design" and what does not. Therefore your entire argument fails. "Too obvious" is no argument *at all* .... anywhere, for anything. "Too obvious" is totally undefined and subject to your subjective interpretation.
You are also assuming, (wrongly), that at its fundamental level, quantum reality acts according to what is perceived as "intuitive" by human brains, which only observe the macro universe. Disputing your religious crap is not "lying".

Again, I provided plenty of proof and evidence in text, links, videos,......  It's not my fault you ignored it.