You're a liar. You NEVER ONCE provided examples of what was complex, but not complex ENOUGH, so as not to need a designer.
You have no specific criteria. Your argument is not only bogus, but dishonest as the distinctions you PRETEND to have and employ, do not exist.
You cannot say what is and is not complex ENOUGH, and exactly what level of complexity requires a designer. "Obvious" is not good enough.
You are incapable of doing this definition and sorting out the details. You're a fraud.
You have no specific criteria. Your argument is not only bogus, but dishonest as the distinctions you PRETEND to have and employ, do not exist.
You cannot say what is and is not complex ENOUGH, and exactly what level of complexity requires a designer. "Obvious" is not good enough.
You are incapable of doing this definition and sorting out the details. You're a fraud.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist