(March 28, 2019 at 1:49 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: ............?
The hypothetical historical character of the hypothetical historical document q....was not. Nor was he a carpenter or the son of a carpenter. Nor was he a raving apocalyptic loon. Nor was he a seditious anti-roman provacateur, nor did he speak at the temple, nor was he ever arrested or crucified by pilate or any other.
He was a smart, well spoken, well educated, and lucid secular philosopher of a greek tradition..who, like many others in that tradition, wandered around galilee...but probably wasn't born there.
My only claim was that Q was an historical document, not that it contained a single word spoken by the historical Jesus.
