(April 1, 2019 at 5:00 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(April 1, 2019 at 3:21 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Then you’re wrong. Come on, CDF. All you have to do is look around, and it becomes obvious that slow changes over time added up to large changes. The proof is right in front of you, and if you disagree with me then you’re wrong. The evidence is life itself. How does it feel to have your own argument written back to you?
You see, if you’re not responsible for providing evidence that we were designed, or how we were designed, then neither am I, or anyone else for that matter. We can all just sit around here endlessly with our thumbs up our butts, asserting our beliefs.
I provided proof and evidence though. I didn't make baseless assertions.
(April 1, 2019 at 3:27 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Your OP is not an argument; it’s a description of DNA with the conclusion of an argument you never fostered built into the first sentence, lol.
Bam. Counter argument. /thread.
While complex and functional cannot be explained by natural processes alone.
Nope. Sorry. You didn’t. You just repeat over and over, “it’s too complex. It couldn’t have come about naturally.” That’s a claim; not evidence. If you don’t have to provide the evidence that demonstrates DNA couldn’t have evolved naturally, then I don’t have to provide any evidence for how it did. That puts our arguments on par with one another in terms of quality. Therefore, any criticisms that you leverage against my argument can be leveraged against your own. You lose. Na Na Na - Boo Boo. Stick your head in doo doo.
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.