DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[LadyForCamus]

I

[quote='LadyForCamus' pid='1896751' dateline='1554164995']

I don’t care that you said it’s functional. That’s still a description of a thing; not evidence that the thing couldn’t have arisen from natural processes. If the thing was a tiny fairy that farted out microscopic unicorns, you’d still have to provide evidence for how you determined that it would be impossible for a unicorn farting fairy to come about naturally. You don’t get to just point and say, “but look! It’s a fairy that farts out tiny unicorns! Obviously that thing didn’t come about naturally!”  

As I said, if that’s the sum and total of your argument, then it’s the sum and total of mine, and you have no defeators to offer that wouldn’t simultaneously defeat your own: Look around you, CDF. Obviously, all of life on earth is the result of small changes over time accumulating into large ones. It’s just fucking obvious.

It's not obvious.

Yes, it is. Duh.

Where are all the failed and successful intermediaries between monkey and man.

Even if that were true, it would be irrelevant to my argument, and yours. You don’t know every detail of every step of god’s mechanism of action for designing and creating life. You just look around and see the big-picture result. If you don’t have to provide every tedious detail of how it was done, then neither do I. If circumstantial evidence is good enough for your argument, then it’s plenty good enough for mine. I can just look at modern apes, and it becomes obvious that we evolved. Scientists agree with me, and the ones that don’t are obviously just peddling a conspiracy.


How does it feel, CDF? Now, imagine I do this for 1,200 pages. You’d be as ready to drink as I am.

JK; I’m always ready to drink.