RE: Cold-Case Christianity
April 6, 2019 at 2:27 pm
(This post was last modified: April 6, 2019 at 3:18 pm by Fake Messiah.)
OK here is just a little bit more:
So someone in second century (like hundred years after Jesus supposedly died) wrote that he heard that there was this Jesus who died on a cross and that is suddenly evidence?
Roman guards were also not allowed to let crucified people to be buried but let them rot on the cross - but you don't have a problem with that.
They also didn't allow other people to talk to them and yet Bible describes conversations.
Hey man, are you saying Koran is not historical record? If Koran isn't historical record what is it then?
Quote:from the perspective of a homicide detective, there are other problems with the proposal that Jesus didn’t actually die on the cross:
Many first-century and early second-century unfriendly Roman sources (i.e., Thallus, Tacitus, Mara Bar-Serapion, and Phlegon) and Jewish sources (i.e., Josephus and the Babylonian Talmud) affirmed and acknowledged that Jesus was crucified and died.
So someone in second century (like hundred years after Jesus supposedly died) wrote that he heard that there was this Jesus who died on a cross and that is suddenly evidence?
Quote:The Roman guards faced death if they allowed a prisoner to survive crucifixion. Would they really be careless enough to remove a living person from a cross?
Roman guards were also not allowed to let crucified people to be buried but let them rot on the cross - but you don't have a problem with that.
They also didn't allow other people to talk to them and yet Bible describes conversations.
Quote:Jesus disappeared from the historical record following His reported resurrection and ascension and was never sighted again (as one might expect if He recovered from His wounds and lived much beyond the young age of thirty-three).
Hey man, are you saying Koran is not historical record? If Koran isn't historical record what is it then?