RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
April 7, 2019 at 1:19 pm
(This post was last modified: April 7, 2019 at 1:19 pm by Peebothuhlu.)
At work.
Uhm... no, that's also not quite true about the whole 'Junk DNA' thing.
However I'm in no way any kind of knowing the finer 'Nuts and bolts' of the issue other than it seems to be a misquoting or representation of what the term actually is and pertains too.
Also, nice side step of Ticktalic there CDF47.
The possible discovery of a pristine site containg specific fossilization of the KT boundry event is another amazing find.
The list goes on.
Want to try your hand at throwing stones at phylogeny? That's a study that's been around even longer than evolution.
All the best mate.
Uhm... no, that's also not quite true about the whole 'Junk DNA' thing.
However I'm in no way any kind of knowing the finer 'Nuts and bolts' of the issue other than it seems to be a misquoting or representation of what the term actually is and pertains too.
Also, nice side step of Ticktalic there CDF47.
The possible discovery of a pristine site containg specific fossilization of the KT boundry event is another amazing find.
The list goes on.
Want to try your hand at throwing stones at phylogeny? That's a study that's been around even longer than evolution.
All the best mate.
