(April 7, 2019 at 1:11 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(April 7, 2019 at 1:09 pm)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: At work.
Indeed CDF47. But getting your hobbies mixed up with people questioning your ability to think is the weirdness in your reply.
I've got hobbies too. But I make no pretentions in regwrds to my extremly mundane level of education.
Hence why when most creationists give their, effectivly, pre-school level of 'Rebuttals' towards the subject of evolution which has been continuously studied for, what, a century and a half?
On top of which creationists still have nothing with 'Predictive' qualities unlike how evolution meshes seemlesly with Geology/Paleontology/etc with finds such as Ticktalic as an exqmple.
I wasn't just talking about hobbies. I was talking about everything including science, engineering, and mathematics.
Creationists predicted that the junk DNA was not actually junk and they were right, it acts like an operating system.
And do you know what that doesn't do?
Prove creationism.
The definition of junk DNA was that it had no discernable function and indeed there have been many tests carried out on these areas that show that most of those can be disregarded or indeed inserted elsewhere in the genome with no effect.
Some do have an effect and so the classification could change BUT even if all the DNA was functional it would not be evidence for a designer, it would just mean that understanding of DNA would have to change a bit.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.