RE: Van Tillian/Clarkian Presuppositional Apologetics.
October 8, 2011 at 5:40 pm
(This post was last modified: October 8, 2011 at 5:42 pm by 5thHorseman.)
(October 8, 2011 at 5:32 pm)objectivitees Wrote:(October 8, 2011 at 5:31 pm)5thHorseman Wrote: How could you not get that??
The grammar in your text does not allow for that interpretation.
You said: your view is irrational (or something similar to rhythm)
I said: No more than your's.
You somehow conclude that I think that the grape jelly was more likely. You should read more carefully. Clearly says I think any theism is as likely or unlikely as grape jelly.
How fucking hard is that?
I was not defending rhythyms belief in jelly grape God, but ridiculing you belief that his belief is irrational, and yet you are a theist who's religion has no proof of anything it claims, just like rhythms.
