(April 16, 2019 at 9:46 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: As ever, I appreciate the performance of more of your usual insanity. You could always go and look this up yourself, now couldn't you? It is a simple statement of fact that the overwhelming majority of scholars whose consensus you selectively value are, themselves, believers. They're the people who have been identifying anachronisms, errors, and flat out legendary fiction in magic book for all these centuries.
Whether or not it is your firmly held belief that you could (and have) corrected all of this in magic book is irrelevant to that.
What a hypocrite in the truest sense of the word.
When ever I make a blanket statement or what seems to be an odd or off the cuff remark that does not sound right or does not read true, I almost always am asked to provide not only a citation but a ready defense.
You can't exactly google what you posted here, therefore because you made the statement you are responsible to provide a source or citation that proves you are not lying/saying anything to win an argument.
4th time now. I you believe the majority of Christian side with atheist when interpreting scripture I ak you provide some source that the majority of scholars read or interpret scripture as you have indicated. more specifically this portion of luke 1 and 2
