(April 18, 2019 at 6:50 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(April 18, 2019 at 5:04 pm)Abaddon_ire Wrote: I neither like nor dislike them. They are simply stupidly wrong. That is another lie from you.
How about your claim that DNA was like machine code. Care to demonstrate an "if, then" loop in this imaginary DNA machine code? How about a "for, next" loop? How about a "stack"? How about a simple INC or DEC mnemonic? For the laugh, have a go at multi-threading. That has to be worth a giggle.
No? Oh dear. Another of your lies. You have no clue what machine code is or does and your favourite goto authors don't either. They simply lie to you and depend on you to brainlessly repeat their lies. And that makes them your lies.
This is what I meant:
<snip dumb analogy provided for the hard of thinking>
You do realise that all that rubbish is a fucking analogy provided for the hard of thinking, right?
You do realise that taking an analogy to stupid lengths is an actual thing, right?
You posting a child's analogy like that merely confirms that you understand none of it.
