At work.
First point is, indeed, not a rebuttal.
Second point thank you.
Third point does stand untill actually adressed properly by yourself.
Fourth point I have asked before how and you can not seem to explain. Plus.... are we moving the conversation to abiogenesis now?
You might want to start another thread if you want to talk about a different topic G G.
Cheers.
(April 21, 2019 at 7:31 am)Guard of Guardians Wrote:(April 21, 2019 at 7:28 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: I did actually express that I'd seen youtubz of the fellow before. Not a rebuttal.
Being occupied, I can't currently state whether it was the one offered by G G. Understandable
My contention, though, still stands. Not really.
Why is/should a chemist worth more stick than an anthropologist? Because what he DOES FOR A LIVING is relevant to the question of abiogenesis and is therefore in the area of his expertise.
First point is, indeed, not a rebuttal.
Second point thank you.
Third point does stand untill actually adressed properly by yourself.
Fourth point I have asked before how and you can not seem to explain. Plus.... are we moving the conversation to abiogenesis now?
You might want to start another thread if you want to talk about a different topic G G.
Cheers.
