DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

He makes a really solid case for design.

CDF47

He shows things must have been designed.

When I make a mistake I appologise, it is just common decency, the morally correct thing to do 

You either didn't realise that you made a mistake at first, but now you do  .....

or you are being Intellectually dishonest ....


Even if you are so arrogant that you think admitting a mistake to an atheist is below you, remember other Christians are reading these threads ..... YOU SIR ARE PUTTING YOUR RELIGION INTO DISREPUTE   Had it been an atheist acting in this manner I would be angrier than I am at you ....

'Intellectual dishonesty is the advocacy of a position known to be false. An argument which is misused to advance an agenda or to reinforce one's deeply held beliefs in the face of overwhelming evidence contrary.'

You clearly made out that DR Tour was making a solid case for design  ..... HE DID NOT  .... you may see a solid case in ANY complex scientific video and conclude that the complexity shown convinces you it shows design .... The 'Intellectual dishonesty' is when you then go on to attribute your conclusion to the author when it was not his intent or conclusion  .....

---

I have no problem with micro-evolution and adaptation.

If you accept the above and believe Design then you have to accept it can't be your God ..... That is assuming you believe your God is perfect and all knowing.

a) If God created random mutation how could he know the future?

b) If he does know all the mutations why does he create so many fuckups to get to an occassional change in a species?

More false accusations.  Look in the mirror.  

He allows there to be mishaps in the design since this is a fallen world.  I explained that already.  Good question though.

---

---

I have no problem with micro-evolution and adaptation.

Which doesn't address your unsupported claim that complexity in DNA proves the existence of a designer. Your claim is essentially nothing more than an argument from ignorance.

Obviously, complexity is beyond your understanding. But the fact that you cannot understand how something came to be does not indicate that you may conclude it was designed. On the contrary, lack of understanding indicates that you cannot conclude design or anything else. Get and education, numb nuts.

It is not just complex.  Again, it is FUNCTIONAL.  The code works and operates as a code should.