Embellishments in the Gospel of Mark.

[Godscreated]

 The professionals in their fields determine what is authentic, I trust them to do their jobs wisely. Seems you have avoided my statement to answer your own. Matthew would have written about the temples destruction if the book had been written after the 70's. Besides all this anyone can claim to have written a certain book, Matthew knew that it wasn't important for him to be glorified, it was God who he was bring glory to.

GC

And, so, you accept the datings as found here:

Early Christian Writings

 I'm not familiar with many of those and I see some of the ones I do know as miss dated. There are those that I do not believe to be of value to the Christian Bible. Just like our last conversation you are dancing around the discussion to prove nothing of importance as I see it. You have avoided twice now my original statement to you in this thread, why?

GC

---

 The professionals in their fields determine what is authentic, I trust them to do their jobs wisely.

As long as they agree with you ......Sorry consensus is not truth n

Seems you have avoided my statement to answer your own. Matthew would have written about the temples destruction if the book had been written after the 70's. Besides all this anyone can claim to have written a certain book, Matthew knew that it wasn't important for him to be glorified, it was God who he was bring glory to.

All false

  You need to bring proof of what you say instead of blabbering like a first grader.

GC

---

It's interesting how theists trust scholars in the field of theology, yet they cannot trust scholars in the field of science.

 Many in the field of science are not looking for the truth, they are promoting their truth which is a fairy tale at best. Those in science who do search for truth usually do their work in ways that bring attention to what they are doing and not themselves.

GC