(May 10, 2019 at 1:30 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:Of course CDF has not read the bible himself. Instead, he relies on what some wingnuts TELL him that the bible says.(May 9, 2019 at 11:53 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I think the Bible is inerrant. I think a good commentary can explain problem texts, like the Matthew Henry commentary and others.
Really!
Have you read it?
I mean Leviticus WTF is that about?
For example, out of the 613 mitzvot, he thinks that jebus endorsed the ten commandment only and thus those are only the laws which apply under the "new covenant". He believes this because he has been instructed to believe this, not because he actually ever read the bible cover to cover.
Had he actually read the risible tome he would know that jebus only ever endorsed FIVE of the ten commandments and ignored the rest. Had he read the bible he would know which those were. Had he read the bible, he would know that jebus added two more that were not part of the ten but rather plagiarised from surrounding, pre-existing cultures.
Now, because I have read the entire bible, I know which 5 jebus included and which 5 jebus excluded.
Because CDF has not read the bible, but instead relied on others to TELL him what the bible says, he has no clue which.
Thus we know that CDF has not read the bible.