(October 11, 2011 at 10:42 am)sonofodin Wrote: So you're saying that you can say you lack a belief in something ,even if it has multiple definitions, without specifying which definition you are referring to?
Alright, let's try an experiment.
I'll make a new word: Gooblebloc
These are its definitions:
1.A rare type of cheese
2.a flying pink elephant
3.plastic
4.air
Okay, it's rational to claim that I lack a belief in Gobblebloc because I don't need to specify what I'm referring to!
LMFAO
Are you saying that if i choose to call my penis god then I have to stop believing in my penis?
I dont think thats what you mean at all!
I think you know very well that god, although it has many different interpretations, has some pretty defining qualities at its heart.
It are these things that we reject.
The idea of any 'god' is antiquitated and it is a source of eternal shame that modern humans still cling to the out moded and useless concept in all its manifaestations.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.