Argument against Intelligent Design

[Amarok]

So a bunch credulity and backwards thinking is your argument ......Sad

So after you asked them, did they acknowledge that naturalism was the most reasonable explanation?

Way to not refute my post that you whole post is a giant appeal to crediulity

---

So after you asked them, did they acknowledge that naturalism was the most reasonable explanation?

Because it's the only idea that qualifies as a theory in ascientific sense. It both explains the current status and makes predictions which can be falsified.

Your cretinism does neither.

And I point out once again the term "most reasonable " to him personnel credulity