(October 12, 2011 at 5:37 am)Faith No More Wrote:So you quoted the right answers, but do you get the rationalisation behind them? ie: there is a point where you don't agree with those definitions and would argue your own rationalisation in favour: where is that point?(October 12, 2011 at 4:43 am)fr0d0 Wrote: Ok FNM: answer me these questions for a starter:No
Is faith blind?
fr0d0 Wrote:Is God love; good; our moral guide?
His very nature is good and love; he is the ultimate moral authority.
fr0d0 Wrote:Did his sacrifice for us enable us to be like him?
No, it enabled your salvation and the ability to experience him through Christ.
If you can quote them but they make no sense to you then that's the same as not understanding. Would you agree?
(October 12, 2011 at 5:37 am)Faith No More Wrote:Right. It makes my point too though. "It doesn't make sense therefore we refuse to consider it".fr0d0 Wrote:You mean the secular dictionary definition he posted??the one on post #11 on non cognitivism.