(June 11, 2019 at 9:59 am)SenseMaker007 Wrote:In what way is this normative of logical correctness and coherence different from a moral realists normatives? Or any other normatives derived from any other meta-ethical position?(June 11, 2019 at 9:28 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: The normative statement here is that error theorists and noncognitivists should not or ought not, or can't x -presumably, because if they did, they would not be error theorists or noncognitivists correctly.
The statement doesn't say that they should or ought not to do X. It doesn't say that they would be in error normatively. It just says that the position is logically incorrect and logically incoherent. There's no normative statement there at all.
Nietzsche believed that his own normatives could be derived from nihilism in that fashion.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
