RE: Invitation for Atheists to Debate a Christian via Skype
June 11, 2019 at 8:17 pm
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2019 at 8:18 pm by LetsDebateThings.)
(June 11, 2019 at 8:11 pm)chimp3 Wrote:(June 11, 2019 at 8:04 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: Jehanne accepted your request for debate right here in your own thread, like a page or two ago. Are you not even reading your own thread?I don't think he does. Valkyrie and I have both mentioned he needs to read the rules as he is in violation of the 30/30 rule.
I've read them. And I've read the rules. I don't think I'm in violation of 30/30 rule because of the exception to it. Maybe I'm wrong, but my post still remains as of now. I think its relevant to the ongoing discussion. It's clearly generated much of it.
(June 11, 2019 at 7:59 pm)Jehanne Wrote:(June 11, 2019 at 7:47 pm)LetsDebateThings Wrote: For example, from this thread alone in response to me:
"There's nothing to debate. Either you acknowledge facts or you do not."
and
"Naturally not. We all know how these 'debates' go. You'll do your bit about the value of Christianity and the validity of the Bible. The atheist will respond with criticisms based in reason, history and logic. This will go back and forth for a bit until you invoke the need to accept things based on faith, at which point it is not longer a debate.
For the record, it isn't immediately clear that one can have a 'rational' debate about religion."
My understanding of atheist's tendencies is not completely unfounded. I will grant that it may be an over generalization since many Atheists will disagree on a variety of topics. But you'll notice that the atheist has "reason, history, and logic" on his side, but I just have a "bit" to do about the value of Christianity. Of course, these people are not willing to actually debate.
I may have. They haven't sent me a PM.
Right here. (When you debate me, I hope that you read all of my posts!)
I'd be happy to. I'd like to debate verbally, though.