RE: Occupy Wall Street
October 13, 2011 at 8:35 am
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2011 at 8:41 am by DeistPaladin.)
(October 12, 2011 at 3:39 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Could you explain this a bit more? I'm probably not understanding it right.
Actually, I'm not suggesting any new tax systems but merely a benchmark for determining if the distribution of the burden of running a community is fairly assessed to all groups. Since the top 1% owns 1/3 of the nation's wealth, they should be paying 33% of the nation's tax income to maintain the nation.
(October 12, 2011 at 11:02 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: A republican shitwit will tell you that those people were getting "too good a deal" and shouldn't have been buying houses, being unable to afford it...
As if that justifies selling ANYTHING to people who cannot pay for them while conning them into thinking they can.
Here again we see the effect of religious thinking. The Invisible Hand of the Free Market, blessings be upon its name, is perfect. If the system failed, it must be the fault of government interference. It couldn't be the fault of the system, which is perfect. The Devil is always to blame. Looks like some foolish "do gooder" liberals tried to help those scummy poor people again who are too lazy to do anything for themselves.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist