RE: Here’s my question.
July 18, 2019 at 4:28 pm
(This post was last modified: July 18, 2019 at 4:38 pm by Athene.)
(July 18, 2019 at 1:45 pm)Drich Wrote: when will the feminazis finally understand you only represent a tiny portion of women across the world? Most women in this world WANT their traditional roles.
look I don't care what you do, think, or play pretend with other men hating women.
All I am pointing out is by your own scientific recoging your political position is fighting against millions and millions of years of successful evolution. Evolution that assigned your gender role as well as mine. The same evolution that rewarded the strong family bonds with health wealth and technology and punished the free sex types with living in mud huts or had them remain as nomads well into the era of the industrial revolution.
but go ahead keep preaching the benefits of broken homes and unwed mothers who can at a moment notice leave her and her kids if need be so she does not feel trapped!
cause it is about women as individuals and f- the family.
yes yes this whole subject is about women unequal pay how all men hate and beat their wives because they are racist or bigots or secretly gay or whatever you guys tell yourselves now... if it matters to anyone but you and people like you anyway have at it.
Otherwise know this discussion is about why, God is concerned with sex, and again that is the preservation of family. Fmaily you say is a woman trap...
LOL...Encouraging women to be able to provide for themselves doesn't make a man-hating feminazi, idiot.

I don't roll with such types, though admittedly, I don't give two shits about adhering to assigned gender roles if they get in the motherfucking way of people realizing their full HUMAN potential.
The truth is that dependency on one partner can and does result in poverty for many women and children when "traditional" marriages south.
I've seen that happen to women with children more times than I care to count.
So yes, I think women would be better off if they let go of the mindset that they need be taken care of by others. If they delay having children and take the time to pursue the education and or training necessary to achieve financial independence they will be positioned to take care of themselves, married or not.
Incidentally, I've never told anyone "Don't get married". I've only suggested that women avoid becoming marriage dependent and relying on a spouse's income for survival; Especially if they're going to be cranking out kids.
For some families, that works out beautifully. Kudos for them. Honestly.
For a significant amount of others though, it does not.
THOSE women often find themselves struggling to provide for their children in the event death, abandonment, or divorce, or find themselves suffering a miserable marriage and/or tolerating abuse because they fear they'll be unable to provide for their kids if they leave.
Adopting a mindset of self-reliance FIRST, THEN babies goes much further in avoiding poverty and it's many pitfalls when it comes to this particular issue.
Again, your real issue is that doesn't place your "perfect" Bible-based solution at front and center and actually acknowledges and addresses the potential problems it can present.
I reject the notions that your dumb-ass magic book holds all of the bestest solutions to life and that evolution dictates that smart, capable women should simply marry and stay home even if they don't want to. So I will continue to press forward in advising folks just as I've been doing. And guess what? I'm finding that more and more women are really starting to feel that message.
LOL...So stay mad, bitch.
Quote:Drich wrote:
(I can't wait till evolution takes you guys out)
Oh, look. How lovely.
Ah well...If wishes were fishes, you'd be "real" White guy and would've converted by half this forum now.
As it stands you REMAIN appearing as a robust, slightly anemic-looking Asian man, and have only managed to reinforce the notion that your god and Bible is a thoroughly fictional pile of HOT DOGSHIT.