RE: Equal pay for women's soccer or no Fed funding bill
July 27, 2019 at 6:02 pm
(This post was last modified: July 27, 2019 at 6:06 pm by BrianSoddingBoru4.)
(July 27, 2019 at 5:13 pm)Shell B Wrote: I thought the taking in as much money argument was debunked earlier in this thread.
It was, but here's a reminder for those who may have missed it:
Quote:"From 2016 to 2018, women's games generated about $50.8 million in revenue compared with $49.9 million for the men, according to U.S. soccer's audited financial statements. In 2016, the year after the World Cup, the women generated $1.9 million more than the men."
But only about one-quarter of U.S. Soccer's total operating revenue can be attributed to gate revenues, according to the federation's financial documents. The other revenues come mainly from broadcasting and sponsorships, and it's difficult to parse out which teams contribute more to these revenues because U.S. Soccer sells sponsorships and broadcasting rights as a bundled package.
Still, there's reason to think that the recent success and popularity of the women's team is boosting revenues: Nike chief executive Mark Parker said that the U.S. women's team home jersey "is now the number one soccer jersey, men's or women's, ever sold on Nike.com in one season," according to The Washington Post.
By the only metrics that can be reliably determined, the US women's team generates more revenue than the men's team, and have done so since 2016.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax