RE: Is it OK to have sex with kids?
October 13, 2011 at 7:05 pm
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2011 at 7:09 pm by Oldandeasilyconfused.)
(October 13, 2011 at 5:05 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: Well, to people who believe in moral relativity, yes.
According to tradition,The Prophet Muhammad's wife Aisha, was 6 or 7 when betrothed to Muhammmud, and 9 when the marriage was consummated.
I'm a moral relativist. So far I have not been able to think of a single circumstance where adult-child sex would be anything other than immoral.
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
The full article is worth reading.
Quote:Moral relativism may be any of several descriptive, meta-ethical, or normative positions. Each of them is concerned with the differences in moral judgments across different people and cultures:
Descriptive relativism describes the way things are, without suggesting a way they ought to be. It seeks only to point out that people frequently disagree over what is the most 'moral' course of action.
Meta-ethical relativism is the meta-ethical position that the truth or falsity of moral judgments is not objective. Justifications for moral judgments are not universal, but are instead relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of an individual or a group of people.[1] The meta-ethical relativist might say "It's moral to me, because I believe it is".[2]
Normative relativism is the prescriptive or normative position that, because there is no universal moral standard by which to judge others, we ought to tolerate the behavior of others - even when it runs counter to our personal or cultural moral standards.[3] Most philosophers find that this position is incoherent, or at least that it is unclear how meta-ethical relativism can lead to 'ought' statements.[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism