(October 13, 2011 at 6:42 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote:(October 13, 2011 at 6:35 pm)madashell Wrote: Let's examine the following scenarios.
1. A man and woman meet at a bar, have a discussion and agree to go to his/her room. They proceed to have sex and no money is exchanged. Legal.
2. A man and woman meet at a bar, have a discussion and agree to go to his/her room. They proceed to have sex and money is exchanged. Ilegal.
Does this make any sense at all?
Yes it does, because the first woman does not actually earn anything out of this. The second one, however, requests monetary payment in exchange for sexual services. In short, she is a service provider.
And providing services in exchange for money must be taxed by the government.
And what, may I ask, has that to do with the legality of the act?
I ain't looking for help from on high
That's a long wait for a train don't come
That's a long wait for a train don't come
