How to easily defeat any argument for God

[Acrobat]

A fucking troll is all I can figure. Acro will go down in AF history as the guy who doesn’t know why torturing babies is bad. Nay; he’ll be known as the guy who’d rather be known as the guy who doesn’t know why torturing babies is bad, than be known as the Christian who admits there are reasons why torturing babies is bad that have nothing to do with a god. That’s some reputation to have following you around for net-ternity.

I’ll take that as a yes, that is the type of answer you were looking for. Now I tried to explain why that answer regardless if I gave it, or anyone else here gave it doesn’t answer your question as to why it’s “objectively wrong”.

Imagine if I claimed that good and bad when it comes to pizza is objective, rejecting those that suggest it’s subjective:

And you ask me why is dominos pizza objectively good?

I start describing to you the physical facts of the pizza, the ratio of cheese to crust the variety of toppings, the degree of crispness.

Perhaps you can see why this response doesn’t actually answer the question? It doesn’t establish the “objectiveness” of good here.

Perhaps you recall Grandizer indicating that good and bad are not in the physical properties of anything, they’re not anywhere.

So when the question is what is “objectively wrong” about x, the answer isn’t anywhere in the physical description of x, or it’s consequences, etc...

The type of answer you’re expecting, that you’re frustrated with me for not providing, is one that doesn’t actually answer the question, it just pulls the wool over your eyes.