How to easily defeat any argument for God

[LadyForCamus]

Lol, have I hit a nerve? 😏

No, you seem fairly nice, and I don't get offended easily.

 

“Blind”, sick”, “deformed”, and “mad” are all subjective descriptions of the people perceiving the act. It tells us nothing objective about the act itself. Group A could make the exact same assertion about group B. You have utterly failed to solve the conflict between these two groups using an objective standard. 

Okay, then, how would you resolve the conflict between these two groups? By providing some scientific facts about torturing innocent babies?

And yeah, ofc I’m in group B. The difference between you and me though, is that I can articulate why I’m there, and you can’t. Or won’t. Acro, if you can’t give me one reason why it’s bad to torture babies, you probably can’t give me any reasons why it’s not. You do realize this is a problem for your position, yes?

I can give you all the sorts of reasons  that you would give, but unlike you I know that none of those reasons establish it as objectively wrong. Out of all the facts you're likely to present as a defense, among none of those facts are we going to locate an objective badness.

But my all means, have a go at it, and I'll try to demonstrate that reasons you think you're  there, are false.

If you cut off my head, is that objectively bad for me? Yes or no? My answer is yes.

If you torture a baby, is that objectively bad for the baby? Yes or no? My answer is yes.