(August 13, 2019 at 2:02 pm)Gae Bolga Wrote: Or maybe he is thinking them through honestly, and he’s just honestly dense.
(August 13, 2019 at 2:01 pm)Acrobat Wrote: Both of us recognizes that the holocaust is objectively wrong.
We lay out all the scientific and historical facts associated with it.
What we're not going find to laying among them, issome ethical truth, or an "objective badness" somewhere among the rubble.
If objective badness and goodness, does exist, which you I acknowledge it does, it's not contained in this,.
What’s this “we” business? I’m a realist. Realists do find ethical truth in these facts.
That’s what realism means.
Natural realist like yourself, believe there is an ethical truth laying among the historical and scientific facts about the holocaust. But there isn't. Their emperor has no cloths.
If you disagree, tell me what scientific or historical fact about the holocaust is an objective ethical truth?
