(August 13, 2019 at 10:00 pm)Grandizer Wrote: It's interesting really because what realism means, the way as you and Vulcan have defined clearly over and over again in these forums (and from the videos I have seen on YouTube), many atheists here who would identify as subjectivists when it comes to morality would actually be moral realists but not realize they are.
The way you and Gae have described it, you basically eradicated the meaning of subjectivism from pretty much everything. Gae even went so far as to indicate that as long I have an objective criteria for what constitutes as good pizza, "good" transforms from a subjective good, to an objective one. I think you have said the same thing. We can apply the same justification for moral objectivism, to any subjective preference, taste, or opinion.
Now, I agree with you that there is objective good and bad, but your justification for the "objectiveness" of it are complete baloney. I could create a onion parody of Pizza Taste Realism, leaving no aspect of the elements used to defend the objectiveness of morality absent.
