How to easily defeat any argument for God

[Acrobat]

As far as avoiding anything....you thought that one through about as well as the thesis that taste realism isn’t based on taste.  I pointed out that it doesn’t matter what your goals are with respect to moral realism.  They’re your goals.  They can be whatever you want.  Or you can have no goals at all.

It doesn’t matter whether I agree or disagree with a person that decides they should do wrong.  They’re not my goals, and their idea that they should do wrong doesn’t imperil moral realism in any way.  I wouldn’t make doing bad a goal, but that’s just me.

Of course it does. The terms good and bad in a moral sense, have no real meaning outside of some goal. Just like the goodness and badness of pizza in my example have no meaning outside of my taste. You want to foolishly hide this fact, the way I want to hide the role of taste in my Pizza Realism example. 

Harm is bad.

What does bad mean? It means harm.

Harm is Harm.

What does calling harm "bad" add?  What meaning does the word "bad" provide to "harm", when used as a qualifier. No meaning.

---

Exactly.  Though I’m guessing that you thought this was some sort of brilliant objection to realism.

Thank you for validating Pizza Taste Realism. 

Your membership card is on the way.