(August 14, 2019 at 7:28 pm)Amarok Wrote:1. I directly mentioned you using the site's mention feature, which I also suggested to you.(August 13, 2019 at 9:22 pm)EgoDeath Wrote: How about we disagree with people based on the merit of their points rather than worrying about whose "talking points" they're "repeating?" And, also, how about we start quoting each other or mentioning one another, directly? It makes for more honest discussions.1. Funny you insist on us quoting people while not quoting me.And yes we should worry about talking points being repeated is relivant in the context of the response .
You went out of your way to take OLB's name out of his quote, which just seems like you're trying to slip a response in without him noticing. Either way, it comes off as disingenuous.
@Amarok
Speaking of doing nothing for honest discussion, I love how the media is ignoring that the shooter in Dayton was a leftist who supported gun control. Interesting.
2.The reason I left his name out is technical not duplicity and your not the first to falsely accuse me of this . Plus it's unlikely he was going to respond anyway so why would i need to slip it past him ?
3. Maybe they aren't because it his views on gun control had fuck all to do with why he gunned down a bunch of people . His anti immigrant views did .
2. You can use whatever explanation you like, it just comes off as sneaky, or at least dismissive and condescending. It's not like we're having one on one convos here, it's a "public" board. Quote or mention who you're talking to. It's not difficult. Use some common sense.
3. So a mass shooters views on gun control aren't relevant?
If you're frightened of dying, and you're holding on, you'll see devils tearing your life away. But if you've made your peace, then the devils are really angels, freeing you from the Earth.
