How to easily defeat any argument for God

[GrandizerII]

Instead of hitting the Reply button straight away, can you please take the time to demonstrate how you eliminated naturalistic explanations for morality? All I keep seeing is you saying "X is not in Y, therefore X is in not Y", but you've not shown how "X is not in Y".

@Belaqua, maybe you can jump in here (when you can) and explain on his behalf?

I've eliminated all the naturalistic explanations for objective goodness, that have been offered here, (objective being a keyword). By demonstrating that every attempt to locate objective goodness within scientific/natural facts of x, are false. That there is no property we can call objective goodness that can be located in any scientific/natural fact.

You agree right? That there is no scientific or natural property of Goodness  that can be located with any scientific/natural facts about x?

If Objective Goodness and Badness do exist, but they're not located in any scientific/natural fact about x. Where else could they be located expect in something non-natural?

And he hit the reply button already ... sigh ...

This sounds like something a philosophical version of Trump would say "I have eliminated all naturalistic explanations here, believe me"

By the way, your argument to be successful should not rely on my agreement with any of your premises (on in this case, your twisting my words into appearing to agree with you). The argument should be able to stand on its own and have sound, well-demonstrated premises.

But of course, rather than make that attempt, you'll just respond promptly to this post and not say much of anything.