Enviromentalistic Politics

[GrandizerII]

"Before it's too late"...what exactly do you mean by that? The IPCC says we have to start making significant changes in order to limit warming to 1.5 degrees. It's already too late to stop warming to that level, and yet the world does not end.  What if we take 20 years instead of 10? So we have a little more warming, perhaps a few more associated costs with climate change. You're own imploring that something has to be done "before it's too late" betrays your position that there will be impending doom if we fail to do as you say. 

Maybe you're just to fucking stuck on your point of view to see what you are doing. Thank you, and have a nice night. (and if you prefer not to exchange insults, I can debate without them, but you are the one who started out being a jerky ass-hat).

So you're basically just a climate change denier?  Good to know you're not worth debating.

It's the latest variant of climate change denialism, lol. Agree that it's real but still argue it's not urgent, and pretend that IPCC supports what they're saying.

------

Net zero emissions should be done before 2050 not by 2050. 2050 is the upper limit after which it's going to be even more difficult to fix the issue. The earlier this is seriously addressed, the less difficult it gets. We can't afford to wait 10 or 20 more years before we start thinking about how to really reduce emissions ...

Bernie's plan is the right direction. It may not be perfect but either way we have to get radical about this starting now, not 10 years later ...