(October 9, 2011 at 5:27 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Doesn't realize he answered his own question does he?Still avoiding the direct response eh?
Is ad hominem all you can do? Come on rhythm...you can provide a simple response to my question.
See, what you guys don't get is all knowledge begins with an axiom. Some axioms bear out reason upon examination, some don't. You have essentially claimed Presuppositional Apologetics cannot demonstrate that other belief systems are irrational. You threw in a bunch of humorous quips at it's expense, and hoped everyone would find them convincing.
(actually you aimed the quips at Christianity) I did not find them convincing, I found them to be ad hominem, though they were funny.
Again, do you have an actual argument? Just how is P.A. an inadequate method?
Why is a jelly creator more rational as an axiom than an intelligent being?
