(October 19, 2019 at 1:02 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(October 19, 2019 at 12:43 pm)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: The thing is the courts like to pile on the charges, then negotiate. If they feel like it. In the end the perp has still be charged with those offenses, meaning the law is predisposed to whack his pee-pee harder next time.
Again, I get that. But it still seems to me as superfluous. If those same bank robbers had done the same thing without body armor, how would it change their intent?
Ok you clueless schmuck - explain to me what makes a thirty round more deadly than a 10 round.
And before you do - inform us of how many decades of experience you have with both.
Simple fact - a weapon is only as deadly as the aiming capability of said weapon. An experienced shooter can change a magazine in less time than an inexperienced shooter can acquire a target. Simply spraying ammo is far less effective than aimed fire.
I qualified expert with an m-16 and sharpshooter with a 1911a in 1979 - 40 years ago. I have since then owned multiple AR- 15, FN-FAL, AK variants and a sundry of other WWII military weapons.
I have safely owned, fired, serviced and built firearms for over 40 years.
You? Played Grand Theft Auto? Doom?
And you think you know what the fuck you are talking about?
Sure..
You're an expert.
