(December 15, 2019 at 4:16 pm)onlinebiker Wrote:(December 15, 2019 at 4:10 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Yeah, it's pretty clear that the problem isn't overpopulation, it's resource management.
Boru
That's the Catholic in you talking...
Keep churning out those loveable babies......
....
Unless we do something - there will be a cateclysmic die-off in less than 200 years.
The population is doubling every 60-65 years.
14 billion before 2100.
28 billion by mid 2100s.
....
I am REALLY glad I don't have kids...
I did what I could.
The blame is on the breeders.
No one is saying that overpopulation isn't a problem. But the real damage to the environment is what we're doing to sustain that population at current consumption levels with current production methods.
And, for what it's worth, I'm a big fan of free birth control. I had my vasectomy at 19, and have never participated in 'churning out babies', loveable or otherwise.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
