Politics

[WinterHold]

Secularism doesn't have anything to do with nuclear weapons or foreign adventurism.  It's a domestic policy.  It states, simply...that the state should not compel people to any religious beliefs.  

Do you have a problem with that?

https://atheistforums.org/thread-60329-p...pid1953330

I don't recall a theocratic state that practiced this verse except the very early Islamic nation under prophet Mohammed -peace be upon him-, the massive tolerance to other religions is mentioned  here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_of_Medina

Rights of non-Muslims
The non-Muslims had the following rights on the condition they "follow" the Muslims:[32]

1. The security of God is equal for all groups,[33]
   
2. Non-Muslim members have the same political and cultural rights as Muslims. They have autonomy and freedom of religion.[34]
   
3. Non-Muslims take up arms against the enemy of the nation and share the cost of war. There is to be no treachery between the two.[35]
   
4. Non-Muslims are not obliged to take part in the Muslims' religious wars.[36]
   
   

If you don't care about the Quran -even though it's a fine archeological piece-, you should care about documented history.

---

Do you have a problem with history saying that Islam protected the religious rights of people in the past?
It is even documented ?